Meta's Mind-Reading AI Sparks Urgent Call for Brain Data Privacy
Published on
A new urgency to protect brain data has emerged after tech giant Meta developed an AI system that can reconstruct visual images from a person’s brain activity in real time. This breakthrough creates new pressure to protect the neural data being collected by everyday consumer devices.
While millions of people use wellness and fitness trackers, few are aware of how much sensitive data on their mental state—including focus, stress, and mood—is being captured. The rapid advance in decoding brain signals, highlighted by Meta’s experiment, raises the stakes for this information, which currently has few legal protections. In most places, there is no law preventing tech companies from collecting neurological data or selling it.
This lack of regulation poses a direct threat to mental privacy and freedom of thought. Recognizing the danger, UNESCO recently adopted the first global ethical framework for managing neurotechnology.
Meta’s system uses magnetoencephalography (MEG), a non-invasive scanning technique, to measure the magnetic fields generated by brain activity. An AI model then aligns these signals with image data to generate a continuous stream of pictures reflecting what a person is seeing. While the reconstructed images are not perfect, they preserve high-level features like object categories.
Meta says its goal is to understand the foundations of human intelligence and potentially develop non-invasive brain-computer interfaces to help patients who have lost the ability to speak. However, the technology demonstrates a powerful new capability to interpret complex mental representations, which could be misused if neural data is not secured.
The risk is that data from consumer wearables could be used without consent for commercial or manipulative purposes, such as influencing consumer behavior or monitoring employee productivity. Because brain patterns are unique, losing control of this data could compromise personal autonomy.
To address these risks, UNESCO’s new framework calls on governments to guarantee mental privacy by treating neural data as sensitive personal information, prohibit manipulative uses of neural data in advertising and employment, ensure informed consent for any data collection, regulate the sale or sharing of such data, and protect vulnerable groups by advising against the non-therapeutic use of neurotechnology for children.
The recommendations aim to establish clear ethical boundaries to ensure the technology serves humanity responsibly. This follows a similar UNESCO initiative that led to the global Recommendation on the Ethics of AI in 2021.
While the technology offers transformative medical potential for conditions like Parkinson’s disease and for controlling prosthetics, its expansion into consumer gadgets operates in a regulatory “gray area”. Lawmakers are beginning to respond, with California and Colorado recently passing laws to protect neural data, but a comprehensive legal framework remains absent at the federal level in the U.S. and in most countries.
related reading